A connected document workflow
A running path from where documents arrive — a mailbox, an upload, a shared folder — through extraction and checking to the system holding the record.

Business operations
We turn incoming documents into checked records, with clear review steps for the exceptions.
Invoice INV-1042 · ₹24,800 — Read tax, line items and the invoice total.
Accounts reviews mismatches. Preparing a payable does not authorise payment.
Baseline first. Review after launch.
Bring representative files, including the awkward ones. We use them to establish the rules and limits.
Invoices, purchase orders, delivery records and customer files are practical starting points. We test your actual layouts, file types and scans before agreeing the scope.
We map the required fields, matching records and approval limits with your process owner. Your team reviews the checks before the system goes live.
A person you nominate. The reviewer sees the original file, the mismatch and the proposed next step before deciding what happens next.
What this system does
Every business runs on documents that arrive in the wrong shape: an invoice as an email attachment, a purchase order as a scan, a proof of delivery as a photograph.
Someone opens each one and retypes the numbers into your accounting software. This system reads those documents instead, checks them against your own records and rules, and passes the result to the tool where the work continues.
It takes on the repetitive part: finding the fields, matching an invoice to its purchase order, noticing that a quantity differs or a tax number is missing, and preparing the entry. Each extracted field keeps a pointer back to the place on the page it came from, so nothing is taken on trust. Routine cases move within the limits you agree; anything uncertain stops.
Judgement stays with people. A reviewer sees the exceptions, not the whole pile — the unclear scan, the price that does not match the contract, the onboarding file missing a document — with the original page beside the values. It is built to be honest about what it could not read, because a flagged document costs a minute and a wrong posting costs far more.

A running path from where documents arrive — a mailbox, an upload, a shared folder — through extraction and checking to the system holding the record.
One place where a named reviewer resolves what the system would not decide alone, with the original page beside the extracted fields and the reason it was flagged.
Real examples, including the poor scans, with the correct answers agreed by your team. We use it to prove accuracy before launch and re-check it whenever anything changes.
A record of what arrived, what was read, what changed and who approved it, alongside a simple view of volume, review rate, errors and running cost.
Written rules, the escalation path and a session for the people who work the queue. Your team should be able to explain the system without us.
We connect the channel documents arrive through: a shared mailbox, an upload page, a folder.
Each arrival is registered, so nothing is silently dropped or processed twice.
The document is classified and its fields extracted, each carrying a reference to where it appeared.
We capture only the fields your destination system needs.
Values are tested against your rules and records: does the invoice match the order, is the total correct, is a document missing.
Confidence and rule failures decide what follows.
Anything unclear or outside policy goes to a named reviewer with the evidence attached.
Corrections are recorded, and repeated corrections tell us what to change in the rules.
Approved records are written to your accounting system, ERP or a file your finance team already uses.
Every write is logged, so you can always see what was sent and why.
Bring one workflow. We will tell you whether it is worth building.
Talk to BYBOConnections are agreed one at a time, with the narrowest access that does the job, and nothing is written to a live system until your team has approved it in testing.
Investment
BYBO publishes no prices, because the honest answer depends on your documents and your systems. Scope and fee are agreed in writing before paid work begins, and the first conversation costs nothing. Most engagements start with the Blueprint, a paid diagnostic ending in a recommendation and a 90-day roadmap — including the recommendation not to build.
Two costs matter and they behave differently: designing and building the workflow, which happens once, and running it — the processing, the review time it still needs and the monitoring that keeps it honest. We estimate both before you commit, and the cost guide explains how the arithmetic usually works.
Measured against your baseline
We record a baseline from your current process before anything is built, then review the same measures after launch. A system that cannot be compared with what it replaced is not finished.
Unclear fields and policy exceptions go to a named reviewer. You set where the line falls: a tolerance on a price difference, a value above which every invoice is seen, a supplier who is always checked. The system never quietly guesses to keep a queue clear — low confidence is a stop, not a suggestion. Reviewers can correct any field, and every correction is logged against the document and the person. If a connected system is unavailable, work waits and someone is told. Our guide on when AI should decide sets out how we draw those lines.
Questions
If yours is not here, ask us. The first conversation is free.
Talk to BYBOAccuracy varies by document type and quality, so we measure it on your own examples rather than quoting a number. Before launch we agree a threshold per field, and anything below it is routed to review instead of posted. You see the results of that testing before committing to run it.
The reviewer catches it in the queue and corrects the field. The correction is recorded, and repeated corrections of the same kind become a change to the rules. Anything that reached a live system is visible in the log with the original document attached, so your team can trace and reverse it.
That is agreed before building. Retention, where documents are processed and stored, and who can see them are written into the scope. Access is limited to what the workflow needs. If your sector imposes stricter rules, tell us early — it shapes the design rather than being added afterwards. Our privacy page sets out the position.
Usually not. The workflow is built around what you already run and writes into your existing accounting or operations tool. If a system offers no usable way in, we say so during scoping and describe the alternatives, including producing a file your team imports. We never recommend replacing working software to suit a workflow.
Yes, and we usually recommend it. One document type with real volume and a measurable baseline is the clearest way to find out whether this works for you. Adding the second type costs less, because the review queue, logging and connections already exist.
You do. The rules, documentation and records belong to your business, and a named person on your side owns the queue. You can ask us to operate it, or take it on internally with a documented handover. Either way the arrangement is explicit before launch, not decided once something breaks.
Invoice and purchase order work is mostly reading, matching and checking. A system can do the reading and the matching. Approving the payable, and paying it, stays with your team.
Read the articleMost document work follows the same path, whatever the file is. Getting each step right is what turns a scanned page into a record your team, your auditor and your customer can rely on.
Read the articleCutting out retyping is the easy half. The harder half is doing it without quietly corrupting your records: validation, confidence thresholds, sampling, reconciliation and a way back.
Read the article